Google Chrome's Need for Speed
Tuesday, September 02, 2008
Ever since we opened the Google office in Aarhus, Denmark, I've been bombarded with the same question. What kind of virtual machine are you working on? Finally, I'm able to answer.
It is an open source JavaScript engine and it is fast.
A core part of any web browser is its JavaScript engine. Web applications cannot be responsive and stable without a fast and reliable JavaScript engine. Google Chrome features a new JavaScript engine, V8, that has been designed for performance from the ground up. In particular, we wanted to remove some common bottlenecks that limit the amount and complexity of JavaScript code that can be used in Web applications.
The cornerstones of the V8 design are:
- Compilation of JavaScript source code directly into native machine code.
- An efficient memory management system resulting in fast object allocation and small garbage collection pauses.
- Introduction of hidden classes and inline caches that speed up property access and function calls.
By dynamically creating hidden classes for JavaScript objects, V8 can apply optimizations only possible in virtual machines with runtime types.
More design details can be found here: http://code.google.com/apis/v8/design.html.
Along with V8 we have released a benchmark suite that reflects the kind of code we want to run fast: well-structured object-based applications with abstraction layers and many property accesses. As Web applications grow, we believe this suite will be representative of how Web developers write JavaScript code.
The V8 benchmark suite consists of five medium sized standalone JavaScript applications: Richards, DeltaBlue, Crypto, RayTrace, and EarleyBoyer. A total more than 11,000 lines of JavaScript code. Web applications often spend considerable time waiting for the network connection, manipulating the DOM, and rendering pages. The V8 benchmark suite only measures pure JavaScript execution. Visit http://code.google.com/apis/v8/benchmarks.html to see how to run the suite.
I hope the web community will adopt the code and the ideas we have developed to advance the performance of JavaScript. Raising the performance bar of JavaScript is important for continued innovation of web applications.
V8 is an open source project and we encourage developers to visit http://code.google.com/p/v8.
Posted by Lars Bak, Software Engineer

138 comments:
yoKenny said...
Holy Shit, this web navigator wil be awesome. And first.
September 2, 2008 12:17 PM
Thijs T said...
Great speed so far on Chrome! Nice Job
September 2, 2008 12:30 PM
Jon L said...
Excellent work on the browser guys. I've already experienced the speed of the Javascript engine, as GMail opens almost instantaneously now! (In FF3, load is much slower).
Cheers!
Jon Langevin
PHPSiteSolutions.com
XCSEO Basic, XCSEO Advanced, and XCSEO Pro ::
Free & Commercial SEO modules for your X-Cart Shopping Cart
September 2, 2008 12:32 PM
Desire said...
Not bad at all... But it could be better I guess. Check memory usage
September 2, 2008 12:33 PM
Vincent McNabb said...
Is there a particular reason why Chrome won't install on Windows 2000?
September 2, 2008 12:35 PM
Daniel D. Shaw said...
Love it! It feels smooth and oh so fast, even in a VM on my Mac.
Please give us a way to run Firebug though. If I could only run one Firefox extension it would be Firebug.
Daniel Shaw
dshaw.com
September 2, 2008 12:50 PM
Jacob said...
Like it. Only things I would want more are "view image" and "view background" options on right click. Or at least the option to have them
September 2, 2008 12:53 PM
Concepts said...
Really Fast and very smooth so far, it's a bit different and will take some getting used to but that isn't a bad thing to say the least. Gmail opens almost instantly. Now lets focus on getting some of those Extensions and Plug-ins for this browser along with some themes. Wow I thought I was using Firefox just now, Chrome has spell checking just like Firefox does AWESOME! :)
September 2, 2008 1:08 PM
Alpha0 said...
impressive
September 2, 2008 1:09 PM
Girish T P said...
good stuff for a launch and best of it, its open source... but hey where is the full view option??? plugins please!!! probably it gets better from now on :-)
September 2, 2008 1:15 PM
Schultzter said...
The speed is sweet! But I miss my Firefox extensions (like, ahem, Google Toolbar, and GMarks, and Meebo for Firefox). And why can't subscribe to an Atom/RSS feed in Google Reader like I can with Firefox? I expect Google will resolve all this, but in the meantime I'll stick with Firefox.
September 2, 2008 1:27 PM
Ephilei said...
Blazing fast! Can't wait for the OS X build.
September 2, 2008 2:05 PM
David Given said...
I've just run some of my own benchmarks --- a Whetstone benchmark in C compiled into Javascript using Clue --- and yes, it's fast: I get scores of 91 for V8 vs 10 for SpiderMonkey and 9.1 for Rhino (and 0.6 for kjs). OTOH, if I use Clue to compile into Lua instead I get a score of 33 with the interpreter and 140 with the JIT, so there's still some scope for improvement!
September 2, 2008 2:29 PM
Arun said...
S4 SUPER!
Speed
Stability
Security
&
Simplicity
Cheers
Arun
onchiplimited.com
September 2, 2008 2:49 PM
Luis Figueiredo said...
Any kind of plugin support to be added soon?
September 2, 2008 3:21 PM
Aron said...
Is V8 able to optimize loops like TraceMonkey does?
September 2, 2008 3:57 PM
Swds said...
no Ad killer?
anyway, it's super fast.
September 2, 2008 3:58 PM
Chozno said...
Great speed. Still clearly beta. I Miss Firefox plug-ins but... they will come. Easter Egg: type "about:". Easter Egg2: type "about:stats". Sure more still hiding.
September 2, 2008 4:00 PM
Fuad said...
Simple, attractive and fast so far!
great job, keep it up...
September 2, 2008 4:51 PM
Obliterous said...
Runs smooth, but it's missing some functionality that I personally consider vital...
right-click on a frame-->reload frame.
September 2, 2008 5:40 PM
defcon said...
I am waiting for a linux version patiently, any ideas on a release date/progress? A linux .deb for ubuntu would be absolutely fabulous
September 2, 2008 5:45 PM
miles said...
I love Google Chrome, I have so many ideas and suggestions for this
September 2, 2008 6:27 PM
Luis said...
I wonder how it compares to Tracemonkey. Any estimation? Also, how does v8's design compare to the tracing techniques being used to develop Mozilla's implementation of Javascript?
September 2, 2008 6:42 PM
T.S. said...
Great job guys. I love it. I would expect nothing less from Google. Wonderful.
September 2, 2008 6:54 PM
Paul said...
It's fast, but it's also a bit useless without features. No bookmark management? Really? You should have waited to release it until it was more useable. After this lousy first impression, I probably won't be bothering to try future versions.
September 2, 2008 7:46 PM
Darth Cirrhosis said...
Awesome work guys. I think you missed the home button though. How do I get back to that fabulous start page.
September 2, 2008 7:58 PM
Darth Cirrhosis said...
I've found it. Pretty slick. Takes a while to figure out the tricks but well worth the adventure.
If you are looking for it like me it's in options, when you click the wrench.
September 2, 2008 8:17 PM
Muthusrinivasan said...
Nice work
Really awesome.
The CPU and Memory usage is too high.
Other concepts are really nice, Great job.
Regards
MuthusrinivasaN :)
muthusrinivasan.110mb.com
mojave.tk
ODLS.tk --> Submit your Links For free.
September 2, 2008 8:21 PM
雙火 said...
Just download and nice wook, too! I love the idea behind the inventing of Chrome!
BTW, there's a bug I found: when scrolling the web using mouse wheel, wheel-down is fairly fucntional but too fast, wheel-down is completely dumb!
September 2, 2008 9:17 PM
雙火 said...
sorry, should be 'wheel-up' is completely dumb!
September 2, 2008 9:18 PM
ichbinjustin said...
I love the browser thus far. The only thing that first jumps out at me as missing is the option to hold the scroll wheel down and page up and down that way. I know I can just roll the wheel, but hey I'm lazy and use to holding it down. With that said, move over E7 and Firefox.
September 2, 2008 9:55 PM
nospam092809393939 said...
i feel like you should have worked to improve firefox instead - it was already the "open source" browser.
I just don't think there's a market for it right now.
Just feeling like this will be a PIA like Safari - you know - just enough people use it so that you have to make sure all your web pages, applications, and javascript ALSO work for this browser.
September 2, 2008 9:55 PM
Mr. Campbell’s Soup said...
Thank you, guys! This is the future! A great concept!
Rendering beautiful and smooth.
Nice job, keep up the hard work.
I wanna see gestures...
September 2, 2008 10:13 PM
jack said...
After playing with Chrome for few hours, i must say that it is awesome and i love it.
Now, to use it in production i need:
-roboform plugin or equivalent (i need transparent way to save/view/manage/export/import my user/pw and other field's data...
-tab mix plus plugin (i constantly use 50+ tabs, and things get crowded in chrome... Maybe if you would allow multiple rows and defining minimum width for tab that would be better...)
+
session saving - it would be great if session manager would have functionality from tab mix plus (you can save session profiles, load them, manage them)... much more freedom.
Are there any plugins available for Chrome yet?
September 2, 2008 10:50 PM
Blogger said...
very very thankyou
this browser very faster
but some haveing ptoblem
example problem 1: meebo.com again again refleshing page...
example problem 2: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g
comment window right down widthed scrool corner...
September 3, 2008 12:00 AM
Veera said...
AGAIN IT STANDS FOR GREAT USABILITY EXPERIENCE!!! AND DAMN FAST...I CAN FEEL IT !!!THIS IS AN AWESOME MOVE!!!
AM EXPECTING GOOGLE OS!!
LOVE GOOGLE!!!
VEERA
CREATIVE DESIGNER
September 3, 2008 12:01 AM
Veera said...
AGAIN IT STANDS FOR GREAT USABILITY
AND IT IS DAMN FAST!!!
SOON EXPECTING THE ROCKET LAUNCH OF GOOGLE OS!!
IT IS AWESOME!!!
LOVE GOOGLE!!!
VEERA
CREATIVE DESIGNER
September 3, 2008 12:04 AM
Veera said...
AGAIN IT STANDS FOR GREAT USABILITY
AND IT IS DAMN FAST!!!
SOON EXPECTING THE ROCKET LAUNCH OF GOOGLE OS!!
IT IS AWESOME!!!
LOVE GOOGLE!!!
VEERA
CREATIVE DESIGNER
September 3, 2008 12:04 AM
jscurtu said...
QUESTION:
Chomium ist OpenSource... but what does that realy mean, what about Google Chrome? The way I see this is, Google Chrome is built on top of the OpenSource Chromium..
So does that mean, the actualy Google Chrome is not OpenSource? Just the backend?
September 3, 2008 12:22 AM
valugi said...
It will be a good idea not to install programs based on the locale of the machine. I am in Spain but I want my browser in English and I didnt get to choose from you.
Thanks
September 3, 2008 12:51 AM
Usman said...
Yep.... Extremely light and very speedy.
Good work Google. I want to see if we can develop add on like we do for firefox.
September 3, 2008 1:13 AM
voodoo said...
I got favorite,special "Tabs" look like "Paper Folder",but it's really too bad that doeen't support GoogleEarthAPI plugin,and doesn't still release for Mac.
September 3, 2008 1:18 AM
deca said...
Hey,
Nice layout but the speed is like I'm back on the phone line...
NOT FAST at all!
Hope this is due to the first day.. lots off people log in...........cause this "speed" is not why I'm paying so much for my internet.
Greetz,
David.
September 3, 2008 1:28 AM
pdwalker said...
Google's new browser is very exciting. And FAST!
September 3, 2008 1:30 AM
Jahufar said...
Will extensions/plugins be supported? Tell me you guys are tryin to have some compatibility with FF's extensions!
September 3, 2008 1:38 AM
Sebastien said...
Just amazing...
September 3, 2008 1:39 AM
neiluJ said...
I'm not really happy with the whole Chrome project.
This is another web browser, which will require web developpers (like me) to adapt code, spend more time on specific features and lacks as we're already doing for IE, Safari ...
Why didn't Google contributed to Firefox ? Find any way to work closely with Mozilla to make them add their great V8 engine to Firefox ?
" Don't reinvent the wheel " - nice proverb, but fails.
Oh, and in the Web Developper's FAQ you said: "Apple Safari uses the same rendering engine as Google Chrome (WebKit)" - Please guys... Safari and WebKit are on stage since years, don't try to steal their " fame " !
September 3, 2008 1:39 AM
Dmitry said...
I'm awaiting linux version and source code strip out. I can't believe what webkit, v8 and xul occupy all the space of 400Mb archive.
September 3, 2008 3:06 AM
Freelancer said...
Great work.
This will be written in our WEB evolution history.
I am already waiting for more complicated WEB Apps using smart features of this browser.
September 3, 2008 3:14 AM
Sjoerd Visscher said...
Hi, is this you?
http://www.audiv8.com/forum/showprofile.php?Cat=&User=Lars%20Bak&Board=v8forum_eng&what=ubbthreads&page=4&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=
If yes, is this the reason of the V8 name?
September 3, 2008 3:17 AM
π2 said...
September 3, 2008 3:33 AM
Francis Panganiban said...
This is by far the best, fastest, and most reliable browser I've ever seen. I've even made a blog article about it -- http://pcbuster.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/google-chrome/
September 3, 2008 4:12 AM
PeteBassMan said...
Great job, I really like the browser.
Fast, nice clean interface, and considering that it is a Beta, very stable (up to now anyway).
Just waiting for ad block plus now :)
September 3, 2008 4:43 AM
clarkec123 said...
Great browser
Worrying EULA
Webkit version needs patching!!!
DON'T BE CONNED BY THE TALK OF OPEN SOURCE
Looking into this further:
I have been duped by Google into believing Chrome was Open Source, IT ISN'T
Google Chrome is built with open source code from Chromium.
Chromium is the code Google have released to the open source community with the BSD license,
Chrome built from this code has been adapted for Google commercial objectives (obviously they're not a charity)
It comes with a pretty scary EULA (End User License Agreement)
How many people who installed it read this bit of the EULA
"By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through, the services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the services and may be revoked for certain services as defined in the additional terms of those services."
Worrying?
Chrome (and Chromium) are also based on out of date version of Webkit, this out of date version has already been patched by Apple for their Safari browser
Please read http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1843
for details of the CRITICAL flaw
I am a big fan of Chrome (see my previous posts), but until this critical flaw is fixed it's unsecure to use it
And I will be using the open source Chromium alternative so I don't have to grant Google a royalty free license to use any content I upload/create/display using their Chrome browser
September 3, 2008 5:07 AM
dbm1175 said...
I understand the apprehension of some users, like nospam092809393939 and neiluJ... But I think you guys are missing the point. If there are a million browsers that all support the same standards, then you won't have to worry about coding for specific ones. The idea is that they all should provide an identical base for page developers and allow the choice of browser to be based on performance, features, etc. Not on whether or not it can draw a web page correctly. They should all do that!
As for "competing" with Firefox and Safari, I don't think that is the case. Google is giving plenty of props to both groups. This is what makes Open Source great... Google looked at both and said, "Those are great, but if we do it a little different, we think it could be even better!" Innovation isn't about reinventing the wheel, it's about evolution and mutations and the best ideas surviving and excelling.
September 3, 2008 5:46 AM
Everett said...
Beta it's too much bugged, speed it's not everythings
September 3, 2008 6:00 AM
J3 said...
I wish this stuff had happpened years ago...
But anyways, this is not about Google, or Firefox, or Microsoft. Its about us. The people posting on this blog. Website designers, developers etc...
Firefox is great, heck Opera is probably the most innovative, cause all the other browsers have taken ideas from them. But thats the way of progress.
We can make the web better. Thats what open source is about. Mambo and Joomla are related right? So is Firefox, Safari and Chrome. There is a lot of good that can come of this, but we will have to do something, not just complain.
I would love to see Chrome with addons, maybe even sharing addons from Firefox, but at the same time Chrome should keep the slick interface is beautifuly.
September 3, 2008 7:28 AM
Dale said...
Love it and hope to see it evolve.
* NEEDS add-ons. W/out it will not survive.
* Missing home page button.
* I want more flexibility. I want to be able to move every object to where I want it to be. If I want the back button to be in the bookmarks bar, I want to have that drag and drop option.
* I want to be able to put my bookmarks on the same line as the address/search bar.
* I know you're trying to save space, but hopefully not at the expense of usability. I want a search bar that I can search many different sites with. That won't cost any vertical space. It can be placed on the same line as the address bar.
Also, the user agreement as mentioned by clark is VERY worrisome. Please explain. If true, that's a nonstarter.
I think you'll get there, but I'm not ready to switch from firefox yet. I'll definitely be watching with high hopes.
September 3, 2008 7:32 AM
Zac said...
great browser, fast, simple, lacking a few things, though its still in beta so no complaints. hasnt crashed on me yet thankfully. though will stress test it later and see what it takes to crash it ^_^
*crosses fingers* next in line google os
September 3, 2008 7:43 AM
Josh, wait for it... Lay said...
Could you please include the auto-fill function that you have in the Google toolbar?
Other than that, It's perfect
September 3, 2008 7:55 AM
Robin said...
The lack of Windows 2000 support is very disappointing. Shutting out millions of users worldwide for the sake of - what exactly?
September 3, 2008 7:55 AM
clarkec123 said...
EULA found out, in the great google con job
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/03/google_chrome_eula_sucks/
September 3, 2008 8:16 AM
Xepol said...
Needs better bookmark management and the ability to get to my home pages.
The current home button option only brings up the new tab page it seems - which would be fine if it listed my home pages there, but it doesn't.
Oh, and the search box like IE has that lets me use more focused searches for things is a huge lack.
Once those 3 things are fixed by someone (open source - eventually someone will fix them, I am sure) There is a pretty good chance I will move over from IE. AFter all, it is fast and efficent.
September 3, 2008 8:30 AM
brenhan said...
change the eula so i dont give you all of my intellectual property, and then ill download it. Until then im sticking with firefox
September 3, 2008 8:35 AM
Ali K. said...
It's great piece of work from Google, I like it so far though it needs a lot of improvements. Also, it takes a big heck of memory, each tab with its own process while Firefox is only in one.
Needs a lot of work but it's great.
September 3, 2008 9:07 AM
coolekat said...
I really like it - especially the bookmark bar. However, I'm just a user, not a creator so I don't know about the stuff underneath.
September 3, 2008 9:26 AM
spectatorspeaks said...
Its wonderful, but there should be a way to install Chrome for all the users in a single go. I have a couple of users and for each one, i had to install one by one. I had to literally wait everytime while the installer was downloading setup from the google server.
September 3, 2008 11:13 AM
Dieris said...
Please, for the love of god, address the EULA issue. I really enjoy using this browser, but really also worry about whats going on behind those walls...
September 3, 2008 11:34 AM
carton said...
wake me up when full, buildable source code is available under an F/OSS license. I want no part of closed-source betas, nor partial releases of ``Chromium, on which Chrome is based'', especially when the alternative is so useable.
secondly, are you sure this is the right path? what about making Java cooperate with the HTML rendering engine better? I think it's a better language than Javascript, and is already fast. Why split the effort? for that, I guess you know better than I, and secondly you've already done the work.
but, the first point, on that I will insist. It becomes open-source when you release source, which you haven't yet, not when you start blogging about movements plans intentions and inviting outsiders to do work for your ``community'' for free. People who care about software freedom keep getting burned by hype like this.
September 3, 2008 3:06 PM
Bradux said...
Waiting for the Linux version! Love how you guys support the open source world! We all know it is the future of computing... Actually surprised the linux version was not out at the same time as windows considering you are most likely developing it on linux?
September 3, 2008 3:48 PM
stylite said...
Sounds nice... too bad this app has been added to the list of those who've abandoned the poor forgotten Windows 2000 user. Do I really have to buy Windows again?? I'm still pretty much happy with this one. Maybe Linux next time, though I have many legacy Win apps that will run *really* slow in emulation. Too bad this isn't geared more like the original intent of Java/Javascript/web apps.. more platform/HW/OS agnostic.
September 3, 2008 5:46 PM
Luan M. said...
September 3, 2008 7:29 PM
dserodio said...
I was amazed by it until I read about this EULA... I'm guessing it needs some clarification
September 3, 2008 7:30 PM
Luan M. said...
I liked a lot this browser! This is the first version of something that I really liked
One suggestion for now: put an option to language select in preferences menu.
Thanks and you're doing a great job!
Great regards,
Luan M.
September 3, 2008 7:33 PM
lopovmecka said...
I LOVE IT! GOOGLE, YOU ARE WELL ON YOUR WAY TO DOMINATING THE WEB BROWSER MARKET!
PLEASE, GET US ON OS!! WE NEED AN OS FROM GOOGLE!
STEVAN VESELINOVIC
FLYHIGHSOFTWARE, LLC
Owner
September 3, 2008 10:23 PM
msg said...
As a Windows 2000 terminal services user I am interested in compatible
browsers (currently use mostly NS7.2); I would appreciate a statement from the project folks regarding Win2k and hope that its exclusion is merely a business support decision and not architectural and that such a decision could be amended to permit testing on Win2k.
September 3, 2008 11:34 PM
VEMI REDDY said...
Oh man, Google needs to solve this problem as early as possible, Uses less memory but,when I opened two instances, task manager showing up three instances and simultaneously when I opened up three, its showing up 5 instances were running.I have taken a snap too for showing up
September 3, 2008 11:52 PM
VEMI REDDY said...
Check this link showing up % instances running on taskmanage where as really three instances of Chrome were Opened http://www.orkut.co.in/AlbumZoom.aspx?uid=10266558646336533944&pid=1220511411442&aid=1220486110#pid=1220511411442
September 3, 2008 11:59 PM
Nico said...
Google Chrome is awesome, but still he has some problems with javascript on sites like nl.netlog.com and godsoccer.com
I prefer to use google chrome already after 1 day. But I hope that the devs will do something about this. I don't like it to switch between 2 browsers.
September 4, 2008 3:02 AM
Quintesse said...
"Apple Safari uses the same rendering engine as Google Chrome (WebKit)" - Please guys... Safari and WebKit are on stage since years, don't try to steal their " fame " !
Well actually WebKit is a fork from KDE's KHTML project. So if anybody is "stealing fame" it is Apple ;)
But in fact both Apple and Google are using code from a project that has existed already for years.
September 4, 2008 3:03 AM
Alejandro Murrieta said...
Chrome is the fastest beta browser out there. I hope it'll remain so even after all the features and bug fixes are sorted out.
Firefox used to be fast until features crept in that slowed it down.
September 4, 2008 3:21 AM
Akash said...
I have three things to comment:
1. I could not access to secured location of our multinational bank site for retrieving bank statements.
2. Somehow, it is making my machine slower sometimes. I don't know may be some relation with antivirus which I am using 'Antivir".
3. Beside windows laptop in office, I also use ASUS Eee PC series ultra laptop based on linux. I would highly appreciate if you can make chrome for linux to run on Asus.
Awaiting eagerly for rectification and product development. Thank you.
September 4, 2008 4:20 AM
Danny in Israel said...
Geovision Remote View requires a Active X controller which is user only for IE. What the heck can I do. I cant monitor my workers via Google Chrome.
September 4, 2008 5:57 AM
Martin /oktam/ said...
Please, give as DOWNLOAD STATISTICS.
For first 24 hours, for first 48 hours :-)
Be OPEN-SOURCE in this way too :-)
Big thanks for your work,
Martin
September 4, 2008 8:08 AM
Abi Xalmon said...
I am using windows Vista on Dell Inspiron 6400, Problem is:
Touchpad does only scroll down but cannot scroll up!
Thanks
September 4, 2008 9:56 AM
Forinangel said...
I loved the browser. so many features in it. But one little suggestion from my end. I have been using Apple's Safari for browsing web. it has a search feature thats outstanding. When ever u wanna search a particular word in a web page, u have to use Ctrl+F. and a box would open. as and when u type the word in the box, safari will match the word with the content in that page and HIGHLIGHT that word in yellow. his makes it easier to find the word or link. hrome to has the function, but the highlighting part is missing. if you could add that feature too, it would be an added advantage.
September 4, 2008 11:23 AM
Derek said...
Chrome looks very nice, and I hear nothing but good things about it. You're missing one key feature though: Mac OS X compatibility. I lived on the PC my whole life, and recently made the switch to Mac. It's fast, intuitive, and it utilizes system resources much more efficiently than Windows does. I understand the reasons for a Windows release, but I can't understand why a Mac version wasn't simultaneously released. Generally, when development across platforms isn't simultaneous, the ve3rsion that's released later falls behind in the development arena.
September 4, 2008 11:52 AM
SANEL said...
where is the home page? where are all the buttons?
September 4, 2008 2:37 PM
trinest said...
Am I the only one who finds the browser very slow? - I've herd other reports on it too.
It seems some people get the speed, some don't. I wan't the speed and maybe I'll use the browser all the time.
September 4, 2008 3:22 PM
Vancouverite said...
I think the Windows version is great, but I need a Linux version if I'm going to switch. Keep up the good work.
September 4, 2008 3:41 PM
maureen said...
I downloaded chrome and the java recommended, but to no avail, couldn't play my games at pogo, it kept telling me to download java and openoffice, both of which I did, more than half a dozen times before exasperation set in and I uninstalled. back to Firefox.
September 4, 2008 4:26 PM
Rick Henderson said...
It does make me wonder if Google is checking the responses to this blog and making a list of requests.
Not too bad... a Facebook window didn't appear when I tried adding a group and not sure if this was mentioned... but there is the security flaw/older version of WebKit that was used.
Tips on how to use the JavaScript console would be good, and in fact what I *REALLY* need, is a simple Javascript editor/debugger with built in FTP option... or an offline Javascript engine. That might make me take a look at V8 actually...
http://typegeek.blogspot.com
September 4, 2008 4:58 PM
CFK31 said...
Chrome looks awesome and I love it's speed. Do you think you could replace windows as well? :)
September 4, 2008 8:20 PM
Bharat said...
only one feature that sets it apart from firefox: tabs with their own process. even that has been implemented better by ie8. should have just contributed to mozilla's firefox project, or webkit. but there's absolutely no sense in fragmenting the open source effort.
September 4, 2008 9:21 PM
Karthikeyan M said...
Google Chrome is simply Phenominal
September 4, 2008 9:53 PM
sekitoripsk said...
it is simply AWESOME. im just waiting for moji plugin to be made available in Chrome so that i can completely shift over.!!
September 4, 2008 11:42 PM
PixelLens said...
At a glance, this browser looks fast as promise.Can we have any add ons?
September 5, 2008 1:41 AM
TeternalGIone said...
http://aviv.raffon.net/2008/09/03/GoogleMule.aspx
Security problems with this browser!
It might be a good start but needs lot of development work and fixing!
Also wondering how much and what kinds of data it collects from you!
September 5, 2008 3:37 AM
SGGZM8lglPmhAGTtpVK7JVWlg6g- said...
RE: clarkec123 - Worrying EULA
clarkec123, what bullet point (or number) is that quote from? I can not find that part of the EULA.
link to EULA:
http://www.google.com/chrome/eula.html
September 5, 2008 6:33 AM
M said...
when you refresh a submitted form... have the Continue button defaulted
September 5, 2008 10:10 AM
hizman said...
I loved Chrome because I am thrilled with what Google does, e.g. Google Talk is my favorite IM.
Now, I'd love buttons that are more adjustable. At least, being able to make them bigger and add text beneath. Like with Firefox.
I believe many are confused with this narrow ribbon style, derived from MSIE. Yes, I am a geek but I do want my BIGGER BUTTONS for navigation! :)
God bless you, guys!
September 5, 2008 2:43 PM
David W. Allor said...
I'll start using Chrome and all of it's Google-market-enhancing features as soon as the Linux version is released. I won't be using it until then.
After testing it on a Windows box, I thought of installing it in Linux using Wine or VirtualBox so I could play with it more. However, the Chrome website doesn't even show me a download link since I'm not in Windows.
September 5, 2008 8:58 PM
黒翼猫 said...
It's good browser.
It also works on my Windows 2000 PC.
September 5, 2008 11:27 PM
praveen said...
It's very Good.Great Speed!
How can we get the updates of 'Chrome'......? There is no option like "Check for Updates"...
September 6, 2008 12:18 AM
Dilshard said...
1) start-up is a flash.
2) no crashes as yet.
3) lightning fast page loads.
4) i like the fact that each tab is independently running, preventing an overall crash. see point 2.
5) just wish they had had a Home button (i had to create one on my own).
6) the font on the address bar seems a bit baby-ish. i wish it were less intrusive in that sense. BIG lettering.
7) the vista look is cool.
8) im never using IE again!
September 6, 2008 8:37 PM
Charbax said...
Tillykke med V8 i browseren!!
Den hurtigste i verden er rimelig fedt!
Kan i få det til at virke på MIPS or ARM baseret $100 laptops?
September 6, 2008 8:45 PM
Googillion said...
I downloaded Google Chrome on the first day given out. I hope the second beta version would be better, so the first version misses some important features. I'm still using both Google Chrome because it's primarily faster than other browsers and Firefox 3 because it has some useful features like add-ons which Google Chrome currently misses. Anyway, I as a fan of Firefox ever would prefer Google Chrome if it won't miss these important features. Many thanks for Google Chrome. It's the fastest browser I've ever used!
September 7, 2008 9:40 AM
Guru Prasath said...
I ran the V8 & Sunspider benchmark tests on IE, FF & GC in my laptop. The results are posted at my blog, http://mandriva.blogspot.com/2008/09/v8-sunspider-java-script-benchmark.html
September 8, 2008 3:51 AM
hizman said...
That's a good information! Thanks, Guru Prasath!
September 8, 2008 5:23 AM
Hector Lopez said...
Very good, The Google Chrome´s is a beatiful Toy, you need to make some implementacion for Chrome became to a Real Tool.the users needs more than just a pretty quick browser, all our life is on internet.
1.- Perzonalization from many extensions.
2.- Chrome Extension Developers Networks is needed
3.- Sincronization of bookmarks some extension o service like foxmark is very , very useful
September 8, 2008 8:10 AM
kevinreb said...
Yet another feature request -- I would like to see the UI shell icon match the web site icon for the first open tab instead of the browser icon.
September 8, 2008 2:44 PM
BCGGXPHILLoP said...
tried chrome and love it.
Chrome rocks. no problems so far and the hangups (eg. not responding messages) I got from IE on my system. but .. a BIG BIG BIG NO NO is that google launched this thing and no google toolbar .. im really pissed! coz i use highlighter to bookmarks and theres no way im going to use the favourite method thats there now. What are google thinking. someone doesnt know what the left hand is doing from the right.
Rob.
http://www.propertyspotter.info
http://www.propertyspotter.com.au
September 9, 2008 8:35 PM
Ravindra said...
Great Speed, very elegant look and its terrific. Great work.
One question, why is that you guys stopped Chrome on Windows2k?
September 10, 2008 3:19 AM
zim said...
Im starting to experience some problems with CHROME .. not so much speed and navigability etc. but more so bookmarks ughh! i hate it that google toolbar is not around and dragging the address into somewhere like a folder which instantly creates a shortcut, plus some other minor issues eg. gmail: the gmails have date stamp of 1 hour ahead!! when the same mail that instant is sent via IE its correct time. ive checked both the gmail settings and PC settings but this is bizzarre. one browser - emails +1hr, IE. normal time.
Cheers. Robert
---------------------------------
My blog is an Australian property hotspots for real estate investors around Australia.
http://www.propertyspotter.info
http://www.propertyspotter.com.au
----------------------------------
September 10, 2008 3:26 AM
(Томи)слав Јованоски said...
too much memory usage on my PC... (P4 1.6GHz; 256MB SDRAM)...
September 10, 2008 4:57 AM
Vincent McNabb said...
@Tomislav
I'm guessing you've got XP? 256MB of RAM is barely enough for that! You need more RAM... I'm guessing you're a student, so you should try and get some spare parts the next time your University/school throws out a bunch of computers.
As for Chrome... Me like.
September 10, 2008 5:35 AM
zim said...
Argghh!!! i could kill this chrome .. well not quite .. i prefer it over IE any day for running but tonight i was in type pad and .. picture an interface with tabs for selection, well, one tab (an editing feature in the website) was MISSING. I waded through help and tried to work out if i'd unticked something and spent a lot of time mucking around. I then descided to log into IE and the mystery tab was there! meaning .. some part of the same website was appearing on IE and disappearing on Chrome.
---------------------------------
My blog is a specialist blog for realestate investors in Australia. Hotspot news, growth locations etc.
http://www.propertyspotter.info
http://www.propertyspotter.com.au
----------------------------------
September 10, 2008 7:13 AM
Ricardo said...
Javascript is blazing fast, but there seems to be issues with Flash. A tab often hangs/crashes when watching videos on YouTube or playing something like kongregate.com/games/arawkins/dolphin-olympics-2 (which runs much slower than FF or IE btw). Happens on this PC (Semprom 2800+, GF6600, 1gb ram), my brothers eeePc 900 4G (both running XP), and on my C2D 1.6ghz 2gb ram laptop running Vista.
September 10, 2008 6:42 PM
pdwalker said...
I've seen the same flash issues. Flash usability is a bit spotty. If I want to play videos reliably, I switch to firefox.
September 10, 2008 7:32 PM
zim said...
had some problems with my adsense playing google videos (with adsense component attached) on my site, very very patchy .. i ended up taking it off as it was too slow.
-----------------------------------
Property Spotter is my blog, a niche news site for property investors in Australias http://www.propertyspotter.info
September 10, 2008 7:41 PM
xalki said...
Yes it's speed is O.K. in Windows 2000 pro sp4 too! But wait, "windows 2000 not supported!". Yes but we found a japanese guy and a Indian blogger describing a method to run chrome. But, although not being a developer, just surfing the net one has the feeling that we who run chrome in windows 2000 now, other than some minor deficiencies probably are exposed to security issues deriving from the peculiar decision of Google to follow Microsoft's model:"Windows 2000 is dead now, upgrade to XP. XP is dead now upgrade to vista, and so on"...An issue is that some arrogant mouths, make fun of not windows 2000 but windows 2000 users directly. To Google related guys who made this decision of not supporting Windows 2000:" Call Firefox and Opera and the makers of the majority of software one can download( from download.com for example) and ask "why are supporting this s...?". Post the answer here.
September 17, 2008 3:54 AM
Petter said...
I do agree with Google chrome speed because it works excellent while browsing. And Google chrome has number of qualities that one can realize during its use.
Outsourcing Solution in BPO
September 19, 2008 4:01 AM
damir said...
Very speed, the speedyest for now. I very much wait the final version! But defect is SEARCH, it doesnt exist, and sometimes get stuck whole browser! Righ click is poor with options. Sorry for my English.
September 22, 2008 6:16 AM
zim said...
Ive found the Chrome browser to be a poor performer on some video sites. I miss the tool bar so much (ie. the highlighter and book marks) and this is very, very annoying. Ive also had some HTML editing features dissapear on some blogging sites and this is crazy!! i need HTML editor to insert google adsense so have to use IE to use that. I love the browser otherwise even if there are a GROSS LACK of features ..
--------------------------------
I run a niche property news blog for Australian property investors
http://www.propertyspotter.info
September 22, 2008 6:31 AM
Larry said...
Honestly. How difficult is it to make Chrome compatible with Typepad? There should be two tabs that allow WYSIWYG and raw HTML. Sheesh.
October 16, 2008 8:17 PM
Zoe said...
i read through the entire ELUA, and there was nothing about what clarkec123 mentioned. It used some words that clarkec123 version had, but it didn't have anything about it being able to manipulate the work you publish through it. clarkec123, could you please make a link or such so that people can see what exactly you're talking about??
October 23, 2008 3:02 PM
Zoe said...
I had mozilla before, and for some reason, when i click on a link to get to my inbox, nothing happens. the same goes for web pages that used to open automatically. Whats with that??
October 23, 2008 3:04 PM
Dennis Weed said...
Need "view image" and "save image"options.
November 10, 2008 4:49 PM
pepebuho said...
When is the Win2K version coming out?
December 2, 2008 8:15 PM
albionpjl said...
My home page does not display any better in Chrome than in internet explore.
All my HTML code tweaks do not run in either of these browsers
actually it's worse, because the video doesn't show at all.
Firefox still rules.
December 3, 2008 12:53 PM
Turist warnings said...
Bookmark management greatly needed! And for Linux! When (pleeeze...)?
December 7, 2008 9:30 AM
DAVID said...
I agree - bookmark management from add or new button very weak and where is Google Toolbar AND Autofill?
Plus add-ons such as page refreshers etc. desperately needed.
PLUS POINTS - clean clear and quick!
December 16, 2008 2:34 AM
DAVID said...
Just discovered many bookmarks not imported on initial installed, including top favourites. Also, alphabetic sort would be good.
Going back to IE7 - will check again later.
December 16, 2008 2:41 AM
bhagya said...
this is good.I'am bhagya you can call me 0602355517
December 18, 2008 12:40 AM
bhagya said...
good
December 18, 2008 12:41 AM
Real Estate Solutions of Texas said...
Regarding Garbage collection. When does it run? I was testing memory usage using a Google Map with a simple POI and Linear layer. As the user zooms in and out, memory usage increases from 50mb to over 200mb. Seems a little extreme. When does the GC run? Are the major and minor collections? Some documentation around this would be helpful.
Thank you.
Travis
December 18, 2008 5:47 AM
T-Mac said...
Google Chrome is the best, i can't believe it it is so fast, it beets fire fox by a centuary, but where is the other plugins. Chrome would even be better if it had fownload helper like Firefox does. But over all Chrome rocks, i downloaded it on my computer and on every computer in my school!!!!! Matrix101
May 30, 2009 2:09 PM
Misty said...
This is my browser of choice these days...actually since the release. I've noticed that other browsers have copied chrome in order to retain users. Actually, I believe this is the most widely used browser in our office!
Team Panella
July 26, 2010 2:15 PM
Post a Comment