Google Chrome Release Channels
Thursday, January 08, 2009
Release early, release often. We think that's the best way to develop software that delights people. With Google Chrome, we want to release fewer features more often instead of making you wait 12 months for the next Major Dot-Oh Release Jam-Packed With Features. We can get your feedback faster, fix things faster, and release new improvements as soon as they're ready. We want Google Chrome to stay nimble so it can keep pace with changes in the sites and web apps you use.
Because we don't have those big Dot-Oh release milestones on the calendar, we don't have long periods of Beta testing new features. Instead we use automatic update channels to release Google Chrome to a community of early adopters. The channels are essentially a never-ending Beta test and a continuous feedback loop that lets us rapidly develop new ideas into solid product features.
You can subscribe to one of our update channels:
- Stable channel. Everyone is on the Stable channel when they first install Google Chrome. The Stable channel is updated with features and fixes once they have been throughly tested in the Beta channel. If you want a rock solid browser but don't need the latest features, the Stable channel is for you.
- Beta channel. People who like to use and help refine the latest features subscribe to the Beta channel. Every month or so, we promote stable and complete features from the Dev channel to the Beta channel. The Beta channel is more stable than Dev, but may lack the polish one expects from a finished product.
- Developer preview channel. The Dev channel is where ideas get tested (and sometimes fail). The Dev channel can be very unstable at times, and new features usually require some manual configuration to be enabled. Still, simply using Dev channel releases is an easy (practically zero-effort) way for anyone to help improve Google Chrome.
To get more actively involved with Google Chrome, subscribe to the Dev or Beta channel. Just run a little program (found here) and that's it. After that, you'll automatically get early access updates.
If you're ready to try some new stuff, we've just released a Dev channel update that has a new version of WebKit, a new network stack, and some features like form autocomplete (read about it here). It's less polished than what Dev channel users have been getting during Google Chrome's Beta, so we've moved all of our existing Dev channel users to the Beta channel. If you were on the Dev channel, you can decide whether to switch to the new Dev channel or stay on the new Beta channel.

67 comments:
Jim said...
Blah blah blah. When're ya gonna release a Linux version is all I care about.
January 8, 2009 5:43 PM
dlangh said...
And Mac. Come on guys...
January 8, 2009 6:12 PM
Steve V said...
Where teh heck is Linux!?
January 8, 2009 6:22 PM
Jivemasta said...
How do you find out what has been added and how to enable it if it needs to be?
January 8, 2009 7:22 PM
pepito said...
When I go to [wrench]/About Google Chrome I see the message "Update server not available (error: 3)"
January 8, 2009 7:27 PM
Matt Cutts said...
Jim and dlangh, if you read the release notes you'll notice changes such as "New network code. Google Chrome now has its own implementation of the HTTP network protocol (we were using the WinHTTP library on Windows, but need common code for Mac and Linux)."
To me, that means the Chrome team is making changes that push Chrome closer to different platforms. I know that Mac/Linux is high on the to-do list, but it's a lot of work. It's coming.
January 8, 2009 8:50 PM
Valerio said...
After Subscribing to a Channel,
does not shows Update Now in About Google Chrome windows.
help please.
January 9, 2009 3:28 AM
Torrid Luna said...
This Article lacks a Linux version. You can help by releasing one, asap.
Cheers,
Torrid
January 9, 2009 4:17 AM
GastonD said...
Linux version pleeeeeaaasseeee!
January 9, 2009 7:32 AM
changes165 said...
linux come on guys where is the love for windows 7.
January 9, 2009 7:40 AM
xian said...
I'm kinda confused still about why chrome was not written in something crossplatform like qt from the beginning, since google keeps insisting that it intends for non-windows ports. If it is/was good enough for google earth why not chrome? (the there is no good crossplatorm widget set excuse sounds like NIH)
Also, I'm excited about the start of the google bookmark integration. Sometimes I think google is one of those organizations where the right hand doesn't know what the left is doing. I don't know why when google offers online bookmarks they would not be in the google browser from the beginning.
January 9, 2009 7:43 AM
mana said...
Valerio: I guess that there's no new beta in the channel right now. The newest beta is the stable version.
I also switched from stable to beta and am offered no update. If I switch to dev, I can see that there's a new version.
January 9, 2009 7:46 AM
Ste Carey said...
Have to Say lads, im loving chrome.
I've already Binned Firefox...and thats a HUGE statement of intent.
Thanks for yet another quality product.
January 9, 2009 8:56 AM
Freitag said...
Hey linux whiners.
Geez people, when you get something for free quicherbichin and enjoy it.
Do you stand in front of a microwave and bellyache that it takes too long to pop your corn?
Chrome is open source - download it and make your own if you think they are not serving your wants (not "needs") fast enough.
January 9, 2009 9:39 AM
Proto said...
I use Chrome at work where (as expected) there is a proxy server. I find that while Chrome 1.x works properly (it pops a dialog to enter the Windows user id and password to access the external sites; not all users have rights to access the wider net..they are limited to a small subset of sites like Msdn or BankThatHoldsOurSalaryAccount..you get the drift) Chrome 2.x just doesn't work.
I mean, it doesn't display the popup and so it just displays the error message (that is displayed for users who don't have rights to access the net). Any idea how can I teach or make Chrome 2.x to display the dialog that accepts the userid and password? I have checked the LAN settings and other settings, and can't find ANY difference with the settings I have for Chrome 1.x (I am not running or attempting to run the two versions simultaneously).
January 9, 2009 9:47 AM
slightlyoff said...
xian:
See this post to understand a bit better why the Chrome team isn't "porting" but rather building new applications for every platform that are truly native:
http://googlemac.blogspot.com/2008/09/platforms-and-priorities.html
Regards
January 9, 2009 10:53 AM
Vince said...
I wish these people weren't so ungrateful. Wah wah, i don't care what you're doing, just give me Linux. Grow up. You know they're working on it. But why should they even support the Linux community if they are just a bunch of whiners?
January 9, 2009 10:56 AM
Saket said...
How about add ons? The reason I pick mozilla over the beautiful chrome is because it has my favorite add ons -- that I can chose to install. This is really the most imp. feature I believe that is missing in chrome
January 9, 2009 11:05 AM
Bill said...
Chrome 2.0 Pre-Beta and still no linux version? Guess we know what the priority is now.
January 9, 2009 2:33 PM
xian said...
slightlyoff: Thanks for the link. After reading I still can't help but feel like a boat was missed. My complaint was not about a rapid port of chrome, but of a lack of engineering the thing from the beginning to run everywhere they want it to run. While the article claims that the base of chrome was started with multiple platforms in mind, I can only assume that refers to the cross platform nature of webkit, because as this announcement shows, the use of WinHTTP is certainly not portable. My real question still gets back to why was this in the code to begin with, instead of using a cross platorm toolkit like qt (which google has used in other cross platorm programs).
But really this is starting to get off topic, so here here chrome. I look forward to the next version.
January 9, 2009 2:41 PM
gak said...
+1 linux please
January 9, 2009 3:02 PM
Dipankar said...
i love chrome thanks....
January 9, 2009 8:50 PM
hadez2000 said...
I love this browser I just have 1 problem with it.. when I maximize it, it sits over my (auto hidden) taskbar in windows xp.. this is one of the main reason I havent switched form firefox yet.
January 10, 2009 1:26 AM
IslandViews said...
do we really need another browser? it will take years to get where Firefox is right now.
January 10, 2009 9:40 AM
Sean said...
Space Bar scrolling doesn't work in new update, please fix.
January 11, 2009 7:16 AM
dankelangelo said...
Google Chrome instantly became my favourite browser, and still is. On my Vista machine. Though I really miss it on my Mac. So. thanks a million for Chrome, great work, and please hurry with the Mac-version!
January 11, 2009 6:02 PM
Mohamed Mansour said...
@Shawn: Space bar scrolling would be fixed in the new release. It has been fixed upstream.
@Saket: They are working on Google Extensions
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/extensions
January 11, 2009 10:43 PM
Xavier said...
Ok, +1 for linux version from here also, but it's because i'm really interester to see if it's faster in an Atom-based netbook than firefox.
And who uses windows on netbooks anyway ? ;)
January 12, 2009 3:03 AM
Sean said...
@Mohamed: How can I get the fix? Is it available now? Look for it where...release channels?
Thanks
January 12, 2009 3:32 AM
GauravPa said...
Why not to share your development objectives or future plans for the chrome so that.
We get to know what can be expected from google.
I am talking about google's plan for the chrome and not the channels
January 12, 2009 10:51 PM
Elez J. Shenhar said...
Common you guys (the guys making comments, that is)
The only thing that matters to me too is a Linux version. I don't use any other os (when I'm not at work...).
But I don't think we need to be whining about it. I trust the Google guys to do the work and I trust the community to help.
Be more positive, Linux guys!
In the meantime, use Konqueror. It's the browser that Chrome calls "daddy" to it :)
January 13, 2009 2:50 AM
Brett B said...
I hope a new release is coming soon. The space bar thing is killing me!
January 13, 2009 9:14 AM
Sean said...
@Brett B: Agreed, the spacebar thing is killing me too. I am starting to like the new IE in the interim (and that's saying a lot coming from me).
January 13, 2009 9:43 AM
Mohamed Mansour said...
@Sean & @BrettB Space bar issues is fixed (recently) within the next dev channel release you will have it. Don't ask me when that will be :) Should be soon.
@Elez J. Shenhar: I can assure you many Chromium Engineers are working on linux, if you take a closer look on how it is being done, you will understand how much work is being put to make a mac/linux version.
@GauravPa: They are shared :) If you read the chromium-dev mailing lists, you will see the indepth discussions that is happening. If you come on irc.freenode.com #chromium, you can read the discussions. As well, you can take a look at the wiki pages at http://dev.chromium.org and http://code.google.com/p/chromium/w/list to see some detailed documents.
January 14, 2009 7:55 PM
[tourist].Tam said...
Oups, Google, You are not going the same way as Mozilla are you? Mainstream user don't care about the small tinkering , just something that works: Rock Solid Application, with some useful options easily reachable from a click of mouse and help for them to browse the web in a comfortable experience (as opposed to a infuriating one).
How can I review all the website that Chrome keep password for or not? How do I manage positively and negatively the website with Google Gears?
If Chrome is going the same way as FF3, I might just uninstall it and return using Opera. Thank you very much.
January 15, 2009 4:39 AM
stricken said...
Thanks for new features with the update. But I would like to share a problem and I will appreciate if you can help.
After updating to Chrome 2 via chromechannel, Chrome started working unproperly. Now it takes a while before it starts opening pages and if I try opening many tabs at the same time, it stops working. Also I experienced some problems in facebook while moving forward to search results and it requires restarting or closing the page to re-open but does not work properly again. By the way, I am using Chrome on a Windows 7 Beta, can this be the reason of the problem? Also I have to say that I could not update Chrome by myself for 2 days after running ChromeChannel and today it did it automatically.
Thanks.
January 15, 2009 11:34 AM
Marin said...
it's true, the most logic thing to do is releasing a gnu-linux version...
January 16, 2009 2:47 AM
randomnut said...
They said numerous times they are hard at work on Linux and Mac versions. I am eagerly waiting for the Linux version myself, but stop posting the same thing over and over.
January 17, 2009 10:00 AM
Ivan Drinchev said...
I'm waiting forward for some development plugins
January 21, 2009 1:59 AM
Dr.D said...
Thanks so much for the Chromium Browser..
I am a shamed at some of the Linux community, asking to the point that you think they are whiners. But I do understand. If you run more than just the windows OS you will understand having to go back to an old browser is crap. I run two screens and the way Chrome allows me to move tabs to the other screen and back.. I see why they are crying.. LOL …
January 21, 2009 10:28 AM
David said...
for some reason chrome seems to be a few pixels too high up on my screen, so when it's maximized, the top of the top bar is slightly chopped off. It didn't always do this.
I'm on an hp dv6000 notebook running vista SP1.
January 23, 2009 10:10 AM
alricu said...
we want GOOGLE CHORME FOR LINUX now pleaseeee
no more words about you are developing it what happen with linux do you thing is not a convenient operative system or what
For LINUX now
January 23, 2009 12:59 PM
PM said...
www.oldgoogle.com - what do you think?
January 25, 2009 1:23 PM
Michael said...
I like Google Chrome very much the one thing I miss is being able to use Roboform or some type of autofill will there be any development for that?
March 13, 2009 1:09 PM
(-_-)ak said...
Is it possible to redirect the last tab to the homepage when I click on its tab's close icon.
Because I want to close only the tab, but I don't want to close the browser.
March 13, 2009 8:34 PM
mrG said...
a word to the linux-request bashers: the argument most often levied is "There is not enough demand for a Linux (or Mac) port" and thus the community is conditioned to ensure they voice their need, especially when the software is as potentially disruptive as Chrome.
So +1 from me on the Linux port, for those who are bugged by that, you make it a middle digit +1 :)
Does anyone know if it works under WINE? I expect not, otherwise there wouldn't be so much pent-up demand bubbling in the comments here.
March 17, 2009 1:38 PM
abed said...
I was hopping for some thing els like the sign in and sign out version just like tool bar on the window explore , so we can take (CHROME ) with us any where we go
March 17, 2009 8:33 PM
sahaj said...
thank you, chrome team.
March 17, 2009 11:42 PM
Mazedul said...
Dear Sir/Madam,
I have problems in Bengali Unicode font setting in Google Chrome. We the user of Bangladesh need an option like Firefox. The option is two way language settings. One is western language and other is Bengali/Hindi/etc. We need this because when we select Bengali font that time we face problems to see some English web pages like Wikipedia. So give an option so that we can select both English and Bengali font. Thank You.
March 18, 2009 7:44 AM
ravi said...
Dear
Goggle Chrome team , why u want to confuse people like us .. wheter to use stable one or beta one. do something or do nothing don't confuse us
March 21, 2009 2:41 AM
Serebii said...
Uh... I wanna download Incognito Chromium for my usb flash drive, where tha heck do i find it?
March 26, 2009 3:43 AM
Ricardo Z. Vendramini said...
Linux version, pleaaase!
April 8, 2009 11:36 AM
Markec said...
also I want the linux version :) Greetings from Croatia.
April 16, 2009 5:14 AM
阿喀琉斯 said...
give us a linux version!
April 20, 2009 7:10 PM
rbendit said...
when using Chrome for web-development like the content management system zms (zope based cms, see zms-publishing . com) chrome is loosing data when click on "save" buttons. That´s why i using chrome for all day things but not anymore for development jobs. I hope this problem will be fixed. Could be that chrome has to be optimized for online form editors.
April 28, 2009 4:21 AM
Daniel said...
uhhh... i just installed google chrome, and nothing has changed, it keeps asking me if I wanna install google chrome.... I knew i shouldnt have done it....dont fix sumtin that aint broken momma always told me..... arfff
April 29, 2009 10:07 AM
Elizabeth said...
I really really really want autofill if I am going to carry on with Chrome which I LOVE otherwise. It is so slick and fast. Would autofill slow it down I wonder?
May 10, 2009 1:07 PM
Molnár Krisztián said...
The 2.x beta has autofill
May 14, 2009 9:56 AM
Elizabeth said...
Thanks to Molnár Krisztián for tip about Beta 2. I have installed it, but don't know yet how the autofill works as I can't see any settings for it except that it is ticked in the settings.
May 15, 2009 2:33 AM
Elizabeth said...
I miss the option to choose "Set as desktop background" when right clicking on an image in Beta2
May 15, 2009 5:58 AM
David W. Allor said...
Linux :-) Linux :-) Linux :-) Excitedly waiting for Chrome on Linux, and getting more invested in FireFox in the mean time.
Shoot, I don't care if it's Chrome or Chromium. I'll compile it myself.
I know you're working hard. Just thought I'd cast another +1 Linux vote to keep you going.
May 18, 2009 12:47 PM
demovik said...
http://preview.test.frontierwebdev.com/frontierwebdev.com/www/company/our_news
There is a problem with scroll-bars in Google Chrome 2.0 and higher
May 22, 2009 6:23 AM
Owais Lone said...
I want linux. Now I'm not saying give me linux now. I understand your problems.
But you should have deployed it on Linux first.
Everyone knows Linux community is great when it comes to contribution. Bug reports, bug fixes and what not. Chrome would have seen much faster development that way. Windows people are reluctant to submit reports or ideas. Linux should have been the primary platform during development.
Anyways, I'm following Chromium and development is sure going real fast. Won't be long TUXERS.
May 23, 2009 2:51 AM
mark said...
and apple version ?!?!?!?
May 27, 2009 2:23 PM
Steve Bassett said...
A few comments:
1-I do not find it faster than Firefox on pages like Facebook.com.
2-When you click on an email link on a page, it takes me to Outlook. On Firefox, the email link takes me to Gmail (which is what I want).
3-When you watch a video, you can not click on the progress bar to skip forward (you can on Firefox).
4-No RSS Reader
May 28, 2009 2:31 PM
S. CELLES said...
It doesn't work with Mac OS X 10.4.11
June 6, 2009 11:41 AM
babaralisk said...
i cant read Bengali Newspaper online. font problem. Can anyone help me to solve it?
June 17, 2009 9:40 AM
Post a Comment