Chrome is Ready for Business

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Since we launched the Chromium project over two years ago, we’ve been hearing a lot of feedback from IT administrators who want to manage and configure Google Chrome. Of course, we were eager to do what we could to help them get Chrome deployed inside their organizations.

Today, after talking directly to administrators and testing the features extensively with other organizations, we believe the first set of features is ready for prime-time. Both Chrome and Chromium are now manageable through Group Policy objects on Windows, plist/MCX configuration on Mac, and special JSON configuration files on Linux. We polished up the NTLM and Kerberos protocol support, and created a list of supported policies and administrative templates to help administrators deploy. For users needing access to older web applications not yet qualified for Chrome, we also developed Chrome Frame, an Internet Explorer (TM) plug-in that provides Chrome-quality rendering for the broader Web, while defaulting to host rendering for any web applications that still require IE.

No feature is really useful to an administrator without great documentation, so we wrote articles to help admins in the configuration and deployment of both Google Chrome and Chromium. We also documented answers to the top questions testers encountered when deploying.

Even though the first set of features is done, we still have a lot more we’d like to do. We have some interesting ideas that we’re working on, including more policies to manage everything in the content settings and authentication protocols, and interesting new ways to deploy policy cross-platform. But we could use your help: please try out the new features by checking out the documentation, downloading the MSI installer, and filing bugs. And let your administrator know to give it a try and let us know what they think.

9 comments:

Nycam said...

Not quite ready, Google.
Some of my customers are unable to complete their orders online at our store, http://letterbank.com as Chrome returns an error. We received another complaint today.

Hockey13 said...

@Nycam Huh? I run an online store and Chrome works amazingly well. Have you tried (*gasp*) debugging your application?

attack11 said...

Nycam, chrome (webkit) exposes errors in the code better than ie or firefox. It's probably not a browser bug; open the developer tools are start debugging.

Mikel Ward said...

@Nycam try fixing these errors.

Alvin said...

Hello,
I have a suggestion about Chrome.
Could you mind add the black list function on the Chrome
I think this is a good idea

INeedHungry said...

The Policy list is Great. Why not create an ADM file that can be imported? Would be much more enterprise friendly with group policy's.

Reidar Johansen said...

Adm templates here:
http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=187945

Peter in Japan said...

Okay, please add these to your list of things to do.

a) a bit more Applescript support. Let us get the HTML source and/or text of the current page using Applescript like Safari has had for 5+ years. Also, there are blatant errors with things like UI scripting (using the UI app in Mac to force things to work, which is only necessary because you didn't give me what I need in the first place). Anyway, please mirror the Safari dictionary!

b) RSS support is totally lacking. Even handing off an RSS feed that was clicked on to another app would be better. (Mac OS X supports this, maybe chrome should)

c) still seeing lacking in the remember of my passwords, addresses etc. It fails to fill in many fields that it seems to know.

(I *love* Google Chrome by the way. It's up there with Gmail and google itself in terms of awesomeness.)

joe said...

chromium.org is really bad

like how you obfuscated the simple

[download]

link every website has for the .exe

you put alot of work into hiding chromium

what to expect from a google site?

google is 100% lame and retarded

like chrome, gmail, spy company, etc.