Chromium Blog: Celebrating Six Months of Chromium Security Rewards

Chromium Blog

News and developments from the open source browser project

Celebrating Six Months of Chromium Security Rewards

2010. július 20., kedd

It has been approximately six months since we launched the Chromium Security Reward program. Although still early days, the program has been a clear success. We have been notified of numerous bugs, and some of the participants have made it clear that it was the reward program that motivated them to get involved with Chromium security.
We maintain a list of issued rewards on the Chromium security page. As the list indicates, a range of researchers have sent us some great bugs and the rewards are flowing! This list should also help answer questions about which sort of bugs might qualify for rewards.
Today, we are modifying the program in two ways:

The maximum reward for a single bug has been increased to $3,133.7. We will most likely use this amout for SecSeverity-Critical bugs in Chromium. The increased reward reflects the fact that the sandbox makes it harder to find bugs of this severity.
Whilst the base reward for less serious bugs remains at $500, the panel will consider rewarding more for high-quality bug reports. Factors indicating a high-quality bug report might include a careful test case reduction, an accurate analysis of root cause, or productive discussion towards resolution.

Thanks to everyone who contributes to Chromium security, and here’s looking forward to our first elite entrant!

UPDATE: We've had a few questions about whether we pay rewards in cases where the bug comes to us via a vulnerability broker. Bugs reported in this way are not likely to generate Chromium rewards. We encourage researchers to file bugs directly with us, as doing so helps us get started sooner on fixes and removes questions about who else may have access to the bug details. We'd also remind researchers that we don't necessarily require a working exploit in order to issue a reward. For example, evidence of memory corruption would typically be sufficient.

Posted by Chris Evans, Google Chrome Security

Google

Címkék: googlechrome , security

Címkék

$200K 1
10th birthday 4
abusive ads 1
abusive notifications 2
accessibility 3
ad blockers 1
ad blocking 2
advanced capabilities 1
android 2
anti abuse 1
anti-deception 1
background periodic sync 1
badging 1
benchmarks 1
beta 83
better ads standards 1
billing 1
birthday 4
blink 2
browser 2
browser interoperability 1
bundles 1
capabilities 6
capable web 1
cds 1
cds18 2
cds2018 1
chrome 35
chrome 81 1
chrome 83 2
chrome 84 2
chrome ads 1
chrome apps 5
Chrome dev 1
chrome dev summit 1
chrome dev summit 2018 1
chrome dev summit 2019 1
chrome developer 1
Chrome Developer Center 1
chrome developer summit 1
chrome devtools 1
Chrome extension 1
chrome extensions 3
Chrome Frame 1
Chrome lite 1
Chrome on Android 2
chrome on ios 1
Chrome on Mac 1
Chrome OS 1
chrome privacy 4
chrome releases 1
chrome security 10
chrome web store 32
chromedevtools 1
chromeframe 3
chromeos 4
chromeos.dev 1
chromium 9
cloud print 1
coalition 1
coalition for better ads 1
contact picker 1
content indexing 1
cookies 1
core web vitals 2
cumulative layout shift 1
custom tabs 1
csrf 1
css 1
dart 8
dashboard 1
Data Saver 3
Data saver desktop extension 1
day 2 1
deceptive installation 1
declarative net request api 1
design 2
developer dashboard 1
Developer Program Policy 2
developer website 1
devtools 13
digital event 1
discoverability 1
DNS-over-HTTPS 4
DoH 4
emoji 1
emscriptem 1
enterprise 1
extensions 27
Fast badging 1
faster web 1
features 1
feedback 2
field data 1
first input delay 1
Follow 1
fonts 1
form controls 1
frameworks 1
fugu 2
fund 1
funding 1
gdd 1
google earth 1
google event 1
google io 2019 1
google web developer 1
googlechrome 12
harmful ads 1
html5 11
HTTP/3 1
HTTPS 4
iframes 1
images 1
incognito 1
insecure forms 1
intent to explain 1
ios 1
ios Chrome 1
issue tracker 3
jank 1
javascript 5
lab data 1
labelling 1
largest contentful paint 1
launch 1
lazy-loading 1
lighthouse 2
linux 2
Lite Mode 2
Lite pages 1
loading interventions 1
loading optimizations 1
lock icon 1
long-tail 1
mac 1
manifest v3 2
metrics 2
microsoft edge 1
mixed forms 1
mobile 2
na 1
native client 8
native file system 1
New Features 5
notifications 1
octane 1
open web 4
origin trials 2
pagespeed insights 1
pagespeedinsights 1
passwords 1
payment handler 1
payment request 1
payments 2
performance 20
performance tools 1
permission UI 1
permissions 1
play store 1
portals 3
prefetching 1
privacy 2
privacy sandbox 4
private prefetch proxy 1
profile guided optimization 1
progressive web apps 2
Project Strobe 1
protection 1
pwa 1
QUIC 1
quieter permissions 1
releases 3
removals 1
rlz 1
root program 1
safe browsing 2
Secure DNS 2
security 36
site isolation 1
slow loading 1
sms receiver 1
spam policy 1
spdy 2
spectre 1
speed 4
ssl 2
store listing 1
strobe 2
subscription pages 1
suspicious site reporter extension 1
TCP 1
the fast and the curious 23
TLS 1
tools 1
tracing 1
transparency 1
trusted web activities 1
twa 2
user agent string 1
user data policy 1
v8 6
video 2
wasm 1
web 1
web apps 1
web assembly 2
web developers 1
web intents 1
web packaging 1
web payments 1
web platform 1
web request api 1
web vitals 1
web.dev 1
web.dev live 1
webapi 1
webassembly 1
webaudio 3
webgl 7
webkit 5
WebM 1
webmaster 1
webp 5
webrtc 6
websockets 5
webtiming 1
writable-files 1
yerba beuna center for the arts 1

Archive

2024
- dec.
- aug.
- jún.
- máj.
- ápr.
- márc.
- febr.

2023
- nov.
- okt.
- szept.
- aug.
- jún.
- máj.
- ápr.
- febr.

2022
- dec.
- szept.
- aug.
- jún.
- máj.
- ápr.
- márc.
- febr.
- jan.

2021
- dec.
- nov.
- okt.
- szept.
- aug.
- júl.
- jún.
- máj.
- ápr.
- márc.
- febr.
- jan.

2020
- dec.
- nov.
- okt.
- szept.
- aug.
- júl.
- jún.
- máj.
- ápr.
- márc.
- febr.
- jan.

2019
- dec.
- nov.
- okt.
- szept.
- aug.
- júl.
- jún.
- máj.
- ápr.
- márc.
- febr.
- jan.

2018
- dec.
- nov.
- okt.
- szept.
- aug.
- júl.
- jún.
- máj.
- ápr.
- márc.
- febr.
- jan.

2017
- dec.
- nov.
- okt.
- szept.
- aug.
- júl.
- jún.
- máj.
- ápr.
- márc.
- febr.
- jan.

2016
- dec.
- nov.
- okt.
- szept.
- aug.
- jún.
- máj.
- ápr.
- márc.
- febr.
- jan.

2015
- dec.
- nov.
- okt.
- szept.
- aug.
- júl.
- jún.
- máj.
- ápr.
- márc.
- febr.
- jan.

2014
- dec.
- nov.
- okt.
- szept.
- aug.
- júl.
- jún.
- máj.
- ápr.
- márc.
- febr.
- jan.

2013
- dec.
- nov.
- okt.
- szept.
- aug.
- júl.
- jún.
- máj.
- ápr.
- márc.
- febr.
- jan.

2012
- dec.
- nov.
- okt.
- szept.
- aug.
- júl.
- jún.
- máj.
- ápr.
- márc.
- febr.
- jan.

2011
- dec.
- nov.
- okt.
- szept.
- aug.
- júl.
- jún.
- máj.
- ápr.
- márc.
- febr.
- jan.

2010
- dec.
- nov.
- okt.
- szept.
- aug.
- júl.
- jún.
- máj.
- ápr.
- márc.
- febr.
- jan.

2009
- dec.
- nov.
- szept.
- aug.
- júl.
- jún.
- máj.
- ápr.
- márc.
- febr.
- jan.

2008
- dec.
- nov.
- okt.
- szept.

Feed

Give us feedback in our Product Forums.

Google
Privacy
Terms